Session 13 : Trade in the WTO Dispute Settlement

The Basic Law of WTO Trade Dispute

• Regulated: Understanding on Rules and Procedures Governing the Settlement Dispute (known as he Dispute Settlement Dispute) which is part of annex 2 WTO Agreement.
• Article XXII of GATT requires the disputing parties can resolve their disputes through bilateral consultations and multilateral consultations can be requested by either party if the dispute could not be settled through bilateral consultations.

Article XXII contains two separate verses:

Verse 1: confirms the existence of two offenses described in three circumstances, namely:

1. Non-performance of obligations of the parties under the GATT agreement.
2. The implementation or execution of an action by a party, whether or not the offense is against the          GATT agreement.
3. Any other circumstances or situations.

Verse 2: contains two key provisions, namely:

1. First, it requires the parties to submit their disputes to the supreme body of the GATT, the contracting party, if the parties fail to resolve a bilateral basis in accordance with paragraph [1].
2. Secondly, this verse shows three verdict forms that can be issued by the contracting party:

• Contracting party shall make appropriate recommendations to the contracting parties (reommended)
• Or give a ruling on the matter [putusan].
• Authorize a contracting party or parties to suspend the application to any other contracting party or parties of such concessions or other obligations under this agreement

WTO dispute settlement phases:

1. .       Consultation
   ·   Consultation is the first step recommended DSU and may also engage third parties to provide consideration.
   ·    Consultation must be made within 30 days of the petition request for consultations.  
   2.       Conciliation and Mediation.
   ·    Procedures approved by the disputing parties and prohibited harming the disputing parties.
   3.       panel formation
   ·   In the formation of the Panel, through its chairman DSB Entitled to further discuss the terms of reference by the parties to the dispute. The terms of reference = rule of law is used.
   ·   The terms of reference should be Circulated to all members and if approved different to a standard frame of reference, then each member state may question the things associated with it to the DSB.
   4.       Arbitration
   ·    Dispute arbitration can be done by making the submission to arbitration or compromise a dispute birth through the creation of an arbitration clause in a contract dispute before birth (clausul compromise).
   5.       Dispute Settlement Body
   ·    Mediation Carried out by a body known as the "Dispute Settlement Body" [DSB].
   ·    DSB set up or develop rules, procedures, consultation and dispute settlement provisions.
   ·    In the DSB decision should be made ​​by consensus and not by voting. In GATT practice, consensus means none of attendees formally refused. 

Dispute Settlement in the WTO : Main Procedures

1. Consultations = 60 days
2. Panel = 9 months
3. Appleate Body = 90 days
4. Implementation  = 15 months

Stages of Case Management at DSB

Phase I: Consultation Article XXII

• Party problematic consultation [Article XII of GATT]. The goal is to reach a settlement in amikal [profitable]. Performed bilateral process between the litigants.
• This process contains a blend of technical and juridical should be done properly, accurately and in accordance with the formal and diplomatic process that requires flexibility.
• The defendants must give an answer within 10 days of the request for consultations.
• For transparency, the request must be submitted in writing to the DSB mencamtumkan reason for the request and specifies the type of action that has been taken parties sued and legal basis of the complaint.

Phase II: Dispute Resolution XXIII

• If the consultations under Article XXII "does not work" then the party who filed the complaint could use a more formal Article XIII.
• Thus, the process of switching to Phase II and at this stage of the process to follow procedures more stringent.
• Formal provisions of Article XIII of GATT states that with the improvement of the system requires that the results of Uruguay Round has absolutely formation Panel. Panel formation process can be seen further in Phase II [b].

Phase II [a]: Resolution Through Arbitration

• Before the automatic mechanism of the formation of the panel is done, there are steps that can be taken before outside panel mechanism.
• Disputing parties who have failed in consultation still have the option not to submit his case to the DSB that the Panel through.
• Another pathway that can be selected is approved lines "good officers" that of conciliation, mediation and arbitration. Abitrasi process is a judicial process that uses tribunal mechanism agreed by the parties to the dispute. DSU allow this option. However, this mechanism is formally outside mechanism managed by the DSB.

Phase II [b]: Through Settlement Panel

• If the arbitration path not taken, then the Panel may be formed. Thus, the process is included in the Phase II [b]. In the event that the dispute can not be resolved through consultations, the DSU requires the Panel no later than the DSB session held after the proposed dispute resolution request, the DSB kecualai if consensus was not established panel, including formulating the terms of reference and composition of the Panel.
• If both parties accept the DSB adopted the Panel decision, then, if the decision also determine whether there is a violation, the next process is the notification about the planned implementation of the decision of the defeated party. Thus, the dispute resolution process directly into Phase IV. But if there are those who are not satisfied, then enter the next process stage III vs stage.

Phase III: Through Appeal Appellate Body

• If, after the Panel expressed its view, no party to the dispute can not accept the decision, then the party who is not satisfied can apply for an appeal to the Appellate Body or the Board of Appeals. Thus, the process in Phase III.
• Appeal proceedings should not exceed 60 days from the date of formal notification by submitting the appeal. Appellate Body handles appeals by assessing the problem in terms of legal, to decide According to the law focuses on legal aspects of the panel report.
• After the Appellate Body decided his views DSB automatically authenticates, unless there is consensus to not accept it. After disputing parties seeked the appeal, the Appellate Body decision is final and binding on the parties involved in the dispute. Appellate Body report must be received by the disputing parties unconditionally within 30 days after the decision is left to the Appellate Body endorsed by the DSB and DSB, unless the DSB decides by consensus not to mengadopasi the report.
• The completion of the Appellate Body Appeal through the process of notification of the decision to the parties in an apparent violation of the implementation of the DSB decisions passed a later stage. In our simulations, the dispute process enters Phase IV.

Phase IV: Implementation and Notification of Implementation

• After the panel lines beyond dispute, and the decision that any party violating the rules Gatt and adverse parties filed a complaint, the Panel typically proposes repeal the adverse action. If it is a decision based on the findings of the Panel DSB, the implementation stage is the stage of implementation of the notification, which is Stage IV.
• Soon after the report of the Panel or Appellate Body report adopted by the relevant parties to the dispute must perform notification of intent and recananya mengenia implementation of the recommendations that have been recommended, the party concerned shall be considered a reasonable time.
• Determination of the time "reasonable" can be reached by consent between the parties to the dispute goals and sanctioned by the DSB, within 45 days after the DSB adopted or determined through arbitration, within 90 days after adoption by the DSB. In implementation, the DSB must always supervise until the problem is solved.

Phase IV: Implementation and Notification of Implementation

• If the action violates repeal was not done within the time frame specified in the Understanding and has been officially decided by the ruling or recommendation, disputing parties can negotiate compensation that can be awarded. The compensation must be agreed upon to be consistent with the relevant agreement overeed.
• Regarding the remedy in the form of "retaliation" [a term used in the GATT / WTO is the suspension of obligation], if the action violates repeal was not done, Understanding says that within the allotted time, the disputing parties can reach an agreement to handle it.
• Reprisals were made ​​through "repeal concessions" on the sector in which the violation occurred. If this is not effective then the retaliation imposed on sectors that are still included in the agreement which oversees shade areas in dispute. If it still can not be done, and if the problem is serious enough, it may be subject to retaliation against a field residing in other agreements.

sources:

http://bm3.binus.ac.id/binusmaya-student/#/class/resources.J1402/2012-2-0

http://www.fas.usda.gov/itp/wto/eubiotech/background.asp

http://www.emeraldinsight.com/books.htm?chapterid=1775990&show=html

http://www.tesionline.com/intl/indepth.jsp?id=326

Session 8 : TRIPS

What is TRIPS ( Trade Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights ) ?

• TRIPS was created from WIPO failure which can't handle the IPR problems.
• Another factor ,global trade condition becomes more complex and ignoring about barrier in each country arround the world
• TRIPS was born in Uruguay turn (GATT) , and U.S became the first country that suggest TRIPS to anticipate WIPO failure

WIPO failure :

• WIPO is an organization where members are limited [not much], so that the WIPO provisions can not be enforced against non-members of WIPO.
• WIPO does not have a mechanism to resolve and punish any violation of IPR
• WIPO is no longer able to adapt to changes in the structure of international trade and technological change in the level of invasion.

TRIPS aim :

• Increased protection of IPR of products traded
• Ensure the implementation of the IPR procedures that do not impede trade
• Formulate the rules and discipline of the implementation of the protection of IPR
• Develop the principles, rules and mechanisms for international cooperation to deal with trafficking counterfeit goods or piracy results on IPR

TRIPS principles :

• Free to determine : giving freedom to the members to determine ways that are considered appropriate to implement the provisions contained in TRIPS.
• Intellectual Property Convention : requires its members to adjust legislation with international IPR conventions.
• National Treatment : providing equal treatment in relation to IPR protection among granted to its own citizens with that given to other citizens.
• Most-Favored-Nation-Treatment : Expediency, favor, privilege or immunity granted by a member state to the citizens of other countries should also be given to the citizens of other member states.
• Exhaustion : requires of its members, to resolve disputes, not to use a provision was in the TRIPs Agreement as an excuse not optimal setting of Intellectual Property Rights in their country.

Kinds of IPR :

1. Copyright and Related Rights

• is the right that creators have to stop others from copying their creative works without their permission. 

1. Industrial Property Rights :

• Patent

•  A patent is an exclusive right granted for an invention, which is a product or a process that provides, in general, a new way of doing something, or offers a new technical solution to a problem. In order to be patentable, the invention must fulfill certain conditions.

• Trademark

• Trademarks are distinctive signs, used to differentiate between identical or similar goods and services offered by different producers or services providers. Trademarks are a type of industrial property, protected by intellectual property rights.

• Geographical Indication

•  a sign used on goods that have a specific geographical origin and possess qualities, reputation or characteristics that are essentially attributable to that origin.

• Industrial Design

• An industrial design is the ornamental or aesthetic aspect of an article.  
• The design may consist of three-dimensional features, such as the shape or surface of an article, or of twodimensional features, such as patterns, lines or color.

• Layout Design of Integrated Circuit

• Protection of the creation of the layout-design; the exclusive right of the right-holder extends also to articles incorporating integrated circuits in which a protected layout-design is incorporated, in so far as it continues to contain an unlawfully reproduced layout-design; the circumstances in which layout-designs may be used without the consent of right-holders are more restricted; certain acts engaged in unknowingly will not constitute infringement. 

• Trade Secret

• A trade secret is a formula, practice, process, design, instrument, pattern, or compilation of information that:

• Is not generally known to the public;
• confers some sort of economic benefit on its holder (where this benefit must derive specifically from its not being publically known, not just from the value of the information itself);
• is the subject of reasonable efforts to maintain its secrecy. 

• Plant Variety

• Recognition of a cultivated plant (a cultivar) as a "variety" in this particular sense provides its breeder with some legal protection, so-called plant breeders' rights, depending to some extent on the internal legislation of the UPOV signatory countries, such as the Plant Variety Protection Act in the US. 

Session 5 : Source of International Law

* Sources of International Law:

• Contract, refers to when 2/more parties tell about the agreements of contracts
• National Law, Law of rules that have authority like Labor resources, Environment , Tollbooth, Taxation, Etc
• International Trade Agreements, There agreements between parties in different nations and they are connected each other in that agreements.like:
• Unifications Law
• Integrations Economics
• Harmonizations Law
• Liberal Trading
• Law Models

• General Principles of Law, the significance of general principles has undoubtedly been lessened by the increased intensity of treaty and institutional relations between states.Judicial Decisions, There is no rule of stare decisis in international law. The decision of the Court has no binding force except between the parties and in respect of that particular case.Often the International Court of Justice will consider General Assembly resolutions as indicative of customary international law.

• Doctrine, All ideas from genius peoples that tell about trade or other flow can be convience people about something happen with trade.
• International Trade Customs, there habit in specific time and place that some parties do same activity intensive. it can be Custom cause that have doing many times.(Opnio Iuris Sive Necessitatis)

*OtherNotes

International Trade Agreements can be :

• Bilateral (2 subjects )
• Regional (have classified in specific regional)
• Multilateral( more than 2 subjects)

Customary international law was born from the practices of the merchants who made ​​repeated such that the repetitive habits with a relatively long time it becomes binding.

A habit of not always be binding and therefore become law. A habitual practice to be binding must meet the following requirements:

1. A repeated practice performed and followed by more than two parties (state practice), and
2. the state practice accepted as binding (opnio iuris sive necessitatis).

General Legal Principles

1. The legal source will start to function when the law of treaties (international) and customary international law does not give an answer to something matters. Therefore, the principles of common law is seen as an important source of law in an effort to develop the law, including, of course, international trade law.
2. Some examples of common law principles, these include the principle of good faith, the principle of pacta sunt servanda, and replace rugi.Ketiga principles and these principles are recognized in almost all legal systems that exist in the world, and there is also the law (trade) internationally.

Agency decisions of the Court and Doctrine

1. Court decisions in international trade law does not have a strong legal force as in the Common Law system (Anglo-Saxon).
2. Status is more or less the same as in the existing legal system in Continental (Civil Law), namely that the earlier court decision just to be considered. So there is a kind of obligation is not binding for the court agencies to consider court decisions existing prearranged (in disputes related to international trade).

Contract

1. Sources of international trade law which actually is the main source and the most important in the agreement or contract made by the vendors themselves. As can be seen, the contract is "the Law" for the parties who made ​​it.
2. Traders (traders) or stake-holdersnya in international trade law in the conduct of international trade transactions, they will put it into written agreements (contracts). Therefore, the contract is very essential. Because it acts as a source of contract law and the need to make their first important reference in carrying out their rights and obligations in international trade.

source:

http://bm3.binus.ac.id/binusmaya-student/#/class/resources.J1402/2012-2-0

L/C Case

I

II

III

IV

V

VI

VII

P U T U S A N

No. 1372 K/Pdt/2007

M A H K A M A H A G U N G

memeriksa perkara perdata dalam tingkat kasasi telah memutuskan sebagai
berikut dalam perkara :
FRANKY THESMAN, bertempat tinggal di Jalan Paradise 7 Blok
F.13 No. 30 Sunter Agung Podomoro Jakarta Utara, dan Jalan
Agung Timur 9 Blok N.3 No. 1B Sunter Agung Podomoro, Jakarta
Utara, dalam hal ini memberi kuasa kepada M. Said Muchtar,
SH.,MBL. Dan kawan-kawan, para Advokat, beralamat di Jalan
Jenderal Basuki Rahmat No. 8-E Lt. IV, Jakarta Timur 13310,
Pemohon Kasasi dahulu Tergugat IV/Pembanding/Terbanding ;

m e l a w a n :

PT. BANK HARAPAN SANTOSA (Bank Dalam Likuidasi),
berkedudukan di Jalan Patra Kuningan Raya Blok L.I. No. 2,
Jakarta Selatan,
Termohon Kasasi dahulu Penggugat/Terbanding/Pembanding;

D a n :

1. PT. PUTRI SALJU INDAH,
2. PT. PUTRI KENCANA POWERINDO,
3. BENNY THESMAN, kesemuanya berkedudukan/beralamat di
Jalan Agung Timur 9 Blok N.3 No. 1B, Sunter Agung
Podomoro Jakarta Utara,
para turut Termohon Kasasi dahulu para Tergugat I sampai
dengan III/para Pembanding/para Terbanding;

pokok permasalahan :
bahwa berdasarkan akta pengakuan hutang No. 281 tanggal 23 Juni
1995 yang dibuat dihadapan Notaris Ny. Lanny Ratna Ekowati Soebroto, SH.,
Tergugat I telah mendapatkan fasilitas kredit dan atau fasilitas Bank, dan
karenanya Tergugat I mengaku berhutang kepada Penggugat dalam rangka

fasilitas kredit dalam bentuk Letter Of Credit (L/C) lokal/surat keterangan
berdokumen dalam negeri yang totalnya berjumlah Rp. 2.000.000.000,- (dua
milyar rupiah) untuk jangka waktu 1 (satu) tahun yaitu sampai tanggal 23 Juni
1996, Tergugat I harus sudah melunasi seluruh hutangnya kepada Penggugat
(Bukti P-1);

bahwa jangka waktu fasilitas kredit tersebut telah dilakukan
perpanjangan, dan berdasarkan perubahan perjanjian kredit (Addendum) No.
017/PMK/KP/TR-P/VI/97 tanggal 23 Juni 1997 telah disepakati perpanjangan
fasilitas kredit sebesar Rp. 2.000.000.000,- (dua milyar rupiah) tersebut sampai
dengan tanggal 23 Juni 1998 (Bukti P-2);

bahwa berdasarkan akta pengakuan hutang (penambahan) No. 47
tanggal 19 Pebruari 1997 yang dibuat dihadapan Notaris Ny. Lanny Ratna
Ekowati Soebroto, SH, Tergugat I mendapatkan tambahan fasilitas kredit/
fasilitas Bank dalam bentuk Letter of Credit (L/C) tersebut sebesar Rp.
500.000.000,- (lima ratus juta rupiah), dan karenanya Tergugat I mengaku
berhutang kepada Penggugat dalam fasilitas kredit dalam bentuk Letter of
Credit (L/C) yang total keseluruhannya sebesar Rp. 2.500.000.000,- (dua milyar
lima ratus juta rupiah), jumlah fasilitas mana tidak termasuk bunga atau biaya –
biaya lainnya (Bukti P-3);

bahwa dalam pelaksanaannya, transaksi fasilitas kredit/fasilitas Bank
dalam bentuk Letter of Credit tersebut, Letter of Credit (L/C) nya dibuka atas
nama Tergugat II, sedang pembayaran/pelunasannya tetap menjadi tanggung
jawab Tergugat I sesuai dengan surat pernyataan dan kuasa tertanggal 22
Januari 1997 (Bukti P-4);

bahwa adapun Letter of Credit (L-C) yang dibuka atas nama Tergugat II
adalah sebagai berikut :
a. Pada tanggal 20 Pebruari 1997 sebesar GBP 335.608.20 (L/C No.
096/001/0553/IMP/B) untuk jangka waktu 180 hari, sehingga jatuh temponya
adalah tanggal 19 Agustus 1997;
b. Pada tanggal 11 Agustus 1997 sebesar GBP 38.024.98 (L/C No.
096/001/0705/IMP/B) yang jatuh tempo tanggal 31 Desember 1997; (Bukti
P-5 dan P-6);

 bahwa Penggugat telah berulang kali meminta agar hutang transaksi L/C
tersebut dilunasi, akan tetapi ternyata Tergugat I hanya mengangsur mulai April
1999 s/d April 2001 yaitu sejumlah Rp.280.000.000,- (dua ratus delapan puluh
juta rupiah) yang jika dikurskan ke GBP hanyalah sebesar GBP 19.126.18;

 sampai bulan Juli 2002 berdasarkan perhitungan Penggugat selaku pihak yang
mempunyai kewenangan adalah sebagai berikut:
• Bunga s/d Juli 2002…………….GBP 217.917.16,-
• Denda s/d Juli 2002…………….GBP 43.583.43,-

bahwa berdasarkan hal-hal tersebut di atas Penggugat mohon kepada
Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Utara agar terlebih dahulu meletakkan sita jaminan
atas tanah dan bangunan milik para Tergugat sebagaimana diuraikan dalam
gugatan dan selanjutnya menuntut kepada Pengadilan Negeri tersebut supaya
memberikan putusan


Eksepsi Tergugat II:
bahwa Tergugat II tidak punya kwalitas untuk digugat karena Tergugat II
membuka Letter of Credit (L/C) melalui rekening pinjaman PT. Putri Salju Indah
(Tergugat I) berdasarkan Surat Pernyataan dan kuasa tanggal 22 Januari 1997.


Eksepsi dari Tergugat III :
bahwa Tergugat III (Benny Thesman) belum bisa digugat dalam
kedudukan sebagai borgtocht, vide Akta Pemyataan Jaminan Pribadi
(Borgtocht) tanggal 23 Juni 1995 dibawah No 283 yang diterbitkan oleh Notaris
Lanny Ratna Ekawati Soebroto, SH di Jakarta;

M E N G A D I L I :
Menolak permohonan kasasi dari Pemohon Kasasi : FRANKY THESMAN
tersebut ;
Menghukum Pemohon Kasasi/Tergugat IV untuk membayar biaya
perkara dalam tingkat kasasi ini sebesar Rp.500.000,- (lima ratus ribu rupiah);
Demikianlah diputuskan dalam rapat permusyawaratan Mahkamah
Agung pada hari Rabu tanggal 20 Februari 2008 oleh H. Muhammad Taufik,
SH.,MH. Hakim Agung yang ditetapkan oleh Ketua Mahkamah Agung sebagai





Laporan Lengkapnya :
http://putusan.mahkamahagung.go.id/

Session 3 : Unification and Harmonization of Laws

The System , Rule and Culture are different in every country.
It also bring the impact for International Trade and its Law to doing trade.

There are 3 way to solve about the different law in each country :

1. Every country in the world agreed not to apply domestic law.
2. Choice of Law
3. Unification and Harmonization

What is Unification and Harmonization?

Its a process to mix or find the best solution for different law between two country

What the different between unification and Harmonization?

Unification : uniformity which includes the removal and replacement of a system with the new legal system.

Harmonization : the quest for uniformity or the intersection of the principles that are fundamental of the various existing legal system and will be harmonized.

Harmonization aims to :

• create consistency of laws, regulations, standards and practices, so that the same rules will apply to businesses that operate in more than one member State, and so that the businesses of one State do not obtain an economic advantage over those in another as a result of different rules.
• reduced compliance and regulatory burdens for businesses operating nationally or trans-nationally.

Institutions Unification and Harmonization of Law:

• World Trade Organization [WTO]
• The International Institute for the Unification of Private Law [UNIDROIT]
• The United Nations Commission on International Trade Law [UNCITRAL]
• The International Chamber of Commerce [ICC]

 Who is WTO?

• There are a number of ways of looking at the World Trade Organization. It is an organization for trade opening. It is a forum for governments to negotiate trade agreements. It is a place for them to settle trade disputes. It operates a system of trade rules. Essentially, the WTO is a place where member governments try to sort out the trade problems they face with each other.
  
  The WTO was born out of negotiations, and everything the WTO does is the result of negotiations. The bulk of the WTO’s current work comes from the 1986–94 negotiations called the Uruguay Round and earlier negotiations under the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT). The WTO is currently the host to new negotiations, under the ‘Doha Development Agenda’ launched in 2001.
  
  Where countries have faced trade barriers and wanted them lowered, the negotiations have helped to open markets for trade. But the WTO is not just about opening markets, and in some circumstances its rules support maintaining trade barriers — for example, to protect consumers or prevent the spread of disease.

What WTO do ?

1. Trade negotiations
   The WTO agreements cover goods, services and intellectual property. They spell out the principles of liberalization, and the permitted exceptions.  They set procedures for settling disputes. These agreements are not static; they are renegotiated from time to time and new agreements can be added to the package.
    
2. Implementation and monitoring
   WTO agreements require governments to make their trade policies transparent by notifying the WTO about laws in force and measures adopted. Various WTO councils and committees seek to ensure that these requirements are being followed and that WTO agreements are being properly implemented.
3. Dispute settlement
   The WTO’s procedure for resolving trade quarrels under the Dispute Settlement Understanding is vital for enforcing the rules and therefore for ensuring that trade flows smoothly.
4. Building trade capacity
   WTO agreements contain special provision for developing countries, including longer time periods to implement agreements and commitments, measures to increase their trading opportunities, and support to help them build their trade capacity, to handle disputes and to implement technical standards.
5. Outreach
   The WTO maintains regular dialogue with non-governmental organizations, parliamentarians, other international organizations, the media and the general public on various aspects of the WTO with the aim of enhancing cooperation and increasing awareness of WTO activities.

UNIDROIT Information

• Set up in 1926 as an auxiliary organ of the League of Nations, the Institute was, following the demise of the League, re-established in 1940 on the basis of a multilateral agreement, the UNIDROIT Statute.

• The International Institute for the Unification of Private Law (UNIDROIT) is an independent intergovernmental Organisation with its seat in the Villa Aldobrandini in Rome. Its purpose is to study needs and methods for Americans modernizing, harmonizing and co-ordinating private and in particular commercial law axle TransCanada States and groups of States and to formulate uniform law instruments, principles and rules to Achieve those objectives.

• UNIDROIT goal is to prepare the harmonization of private law rules or regulations and unification trade between different countries.

About UNCITRAL

• The core legal body of the United Nations system in the field of international trade law. A legal body with universal membership specializing in commercial law reform worldwide for over 40 years. UNCITRAL's business is the modernization and Harmonization of rules on international business.

• Trade means faster growth, higher living standards, and new opportunities through commerce. In order to increase these opportunities worldwide, UNCITRAL is formulating modern, fair, and harmonized rules on commercial transactions. These include:

• Conventions, model laws and rules which are acceptable worldwide
• Legal and legislative guides and recommendations of great practical value
• Updated information on case law and enactments of uniform commercial law
• Technical assistance in law reform projects
• Regional and national seminars on uniform commercial law

About ICC

• The International Chamber of Commerce [ICC] was founded in 1919 and is based in Paris.
• The purpose: to serve world business by promoting trade, investment, open markets for goods and services, and promote the flow of capital.

ICC important  role:

• dispute resolution through arbitration in particular.
• a policy-making body of policies or rules that can facilitate international trade.
• for disseminating information and policies and legal rules internasiona trade among entrepreneurs in the world, and
• providing training and contract design techniques and other practical skills, such as in the international trade   

source :  
www.wto.org/‎
www.unidroit.org/‎
www.uncitral.org
www.iccwbo.org/‎  

Session 7 : CISG

  

CISG Information :

•  The CISG was developed by the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL), and was signed in Vienna in 1980. The CISG is sometimes referred to as the Vienna Convention (but is not to be confused with other treaties signed in Vienna). It came into force as a multilateral treaty on 1 January 1988, after being ratified by 11 countries

• CISG establishes uniform-rules for drafting international sales contracts, and sets the legal rights and obligations of the seller and the buyer under such contracts. CISG rules apply automatically to the sales contracts between the countries who have ratified the convention.

• The CISG allows exporters to avoid choice of law issues, as the CISG offers "accepted substantive rules on which contracting parties, courts, and arbitrators may rely". Unless excluded by the express terms of a contract,the CISG is deemed to be incorporated into (and supplant) any otherwise applicable domestic law(s) with respect to a transaction in goods between parties from different Contracting States.

• The purpose of the CISG is to provide a modern, uniform and fair regime for contracts for the international sale of goods. Thus, the CISG contributes significantly to introducing certainty in commercial exchanges and decreasing transaction costs. 

More About CISG!

•  As of 5 March 2013, UNCITRAL reports that 79 States have adopted the CISG.

 

Source: http://www.cisg.law.pace.edu/cisg/countries/cntries.html

• The CISG is divided into four parts and 101 articles:

• Part I: Sphere of Application and General Provisions (Articles 1–13)
• Part II: Formation of the Contract (Articles 14–24)
• Part III: Sale of Goods (Articles 25–88)
• Part IV: Final Provisions (Articles 89–101)

Read More :

http://www.businessdictionary.com/definition/Contract-for-International-Sale-of-goods-CISG.html

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Nations_Convention_on_Contracts_for_the_International_Sale_of_Goods

http://www.uncitral.org/uncitral/en/uncitral_texts/sale_goods/1980CISG.html

Session 4 : Subject of International Trade Law

*3 Huge Subjects in the International Trade Law :

• Nation, Because it have sovereignty.(have rights to control and decided all about that have connections with law itself) 
• Organizations Trade International, 
• Organizations that have built by government(UNCITRAL,UNCTAD,WTO)
• Organizations that haven`t built by government,means have built by association of people that want to change the conditions of trade world (ICC)
• Individuals
• Individual
• Corporations, like Bank, Multinational Corporations,National Corporations,Etc.

Immunity of nations have restrictions itself:

• Restrictions by International Law
• Restrictions by National Law
• Restrictions in voluntary and quietly
• The conditions that nation decide the arbritation as dispute resolutions, and that time the immunity have  took off 

Standard International, All kind of things that needed for join International Economics Trade:

• Minimum-Standard/Equitable Treatment refers to basic rules that needed for International Trade.
• Most-Favoured Nation Clause refers to rules that lead the nation do non-discrimination act to other nations, with same level attentions with one another.
• Equal Treatment refers to when the nation required to give same attentions to all nations that under agreements.
• Preferential Treatment refers to principal that nation can give special attention to one of all nations.